Home

Author Archive

The Conception of “Inception”

by Danny Manus

With all the big sequels, remakes, adaptations, video games, comic books and book series being turned into movies these days, I find it fantastic that one of the biggest summer blockbusters is going to the be the truly original “Inception,” written and directed by Christopher Nolan.  And I think it’s going to help change what studios are looking for.

But here’s the thing: could YOU have sold a script like “Inception” in this market? No, probably not. It’s a huge movie, a very cerebral movie, and an original idea, much like “The Matrix,” was years ago, where it needs to be guided by an experienced hand with a proven track record and have great attachments. Studios would never green light a movie like this unless it was written by, directed by or starred someone that promised little risk and had a strong fan base.  But I respect the picture because it’s one of the few times where a writer/director actually used his clout in the studio world to make a movie that isn’t exactly like everything else.

Christopher Nolan has made a name for himself by creating original ideas, telling them in an original way, creating original visuals to match, and bringing that out on film. From “Momento,” to “Batman Begins” to “Inception,” Nolan has shown that he is not just an A-list studio writer and director, but he’s also an artist. And that’s severely lacking in today’s cinema. This isn’t meant to be a PR piece for Nolan, but with all the crap getting made, it’s nice to see a project that might just live up to the hype.

I like my popcorn movies and my tent pole blockbusters – I don’t want to watch artsy experimental shit all day long – it’s depressing. But what I love most is when a filmmaker (especially one who also writes the material) is able to make both sides of my brain happy. A smart, cool, and original  popcorn movie. Not many know how to do that.  Sure, there are plenty of directors that can bring a smart popcorn movie to life – Spielberg, Fincher, Ron Howard, Ang Lee, etc. But how many writer/directors are out there other than Chris Nolan, that know how to achieve that kind of balance?

Let’s see…Peter Jackson, James Cameron, Michael Mann, Cameron Crowe, the Coen Brothers perhaps, and maybe the newest entrant to this category – J.J. Abrams. I know there are others you can probably think of, but there aren’t many. It’s these talents that studios will write a blank check for. Directors always say that they couldn’t find a great project, so they wrote one themselves. That’s how Nolan got started. And if you can write, then it’s a great way to go.

Just as interesting as how Nolan got “Inception” made, is why. People want to be in business with him, and because he’s in that enviable position, he gets carte blanche at the highest of levels. But he didn’t start out that way. If he didn’t have the reputation he has, the deals he has, the representation he has – and of course the talent - he never would have been able to make a movie like this.

So, the lesson for writers out there is that power breeds choice. Write that fantastic original big budget project. But more than likely, you’re going to need to build your name and reputation and contacts and resume first before you’ll be able  to sell it. But when you’ve made it, and you finally get to make the project the way you want to, it will have been worth the wait. Just ask Mr. Nolan.

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Mr. Goldman, Know Thyself

by Danny Manus

One of the greatest screenwriters of all time is Academy Award winner William Goldman. His credits read like the list of AFI’s Best Movies of All-Time. “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” “All the President’s Men,” “The Princess Bride,” “Misery,” “Maverick,” “Chaplin,” “Absolute Power,” etc.  And his book, “Adventures in the Screen Trade” is still one of the Industry’s most popular.

I’ve had the pleasure of hearing Mr. Goldman speak on a few occasions at different conferences, and his stories are still fascinating, engaging and oftentimes mind-boggling. But the biggest advice he always gives is that “nobody knows anything” and that “there are no rules.” And while this may be true for a man of Mr. Goldman’s stature…it’s not true for you.

Mr. Goldman and other A-List writers can make their own rules. They can demand not to be re-written, or demand that only certain level executives give them notes, or that their agent demand a million dollar payday. For them, there are no rules. Because not only have they already broken in, but they’ve made it to the top.

But you can’t buck the system until you’re a part of it – a successful part of it.

When you’re a struggling screenwriter just starting out and trying to get read for the first time, you gotta play the odds…and you gotta stick to the rules. The basic rules of format and structure, the rules of what sells and what doesn’t (which you can pick up by reading the trades and reading what’s selling), the rules of what to pitch at a conference and what not to (don’t pitch period dramas, Hollywood insider stories, sci-fi epics, or your own true story), the rules of how to contact a producer or agent, the rules of following up with those contacts (don’t call or email incessantly or nag), etc.

If you believe that “nobody knows anything,” then you are basically saying that a trillion dollar business is run by luck. And that YOU, the first time screenwriter, know better than everyone else. And that is an attitude that will ensure that you’ll be looking in from the outside for a long time to come.

Studios, agents, producers, and even media analysts know what works. Are they wrong sometimes? Of course! Are there projects that sell even though they should be unsellable? Absolutely. Are there projects that bomb when they should be no-brainer hits? You bet! But you have to play the odds when you’re starting out. You have to write something that reads as professional and you need to write something that could generally be sellable – horror, thriller, action or comedy.

Now I’m not saying you should play it safe, creatively. Or that you should mask your own voice as a writer. And yes, when it comes to breaking into the business, everyone has a different story to tell. However, I would say that the majority of the “breaking in” stories I hear sound eerily familiar. Usually something like this…”I wrote my screenplay and I knew one of my old college roommates worked for a production company (or agency/manager/studio) and so I asked him to give it a read. He loved it, shot it up the flagpole, his boss loved it, and I landed my first agent (or option).”

That’s how it happens MOST of the time…one referral, one connection to the business, one friend on the inside that they trust. Mixed with some good timing and some luck (yes, it does play a part), and BAM – you’re in. This might make it seem like there are no rules, but indeed that referral connection is rule number one – it’s all about who you know. It’s about networking and knowing the right people in the right places at the right time.

Are the rules changing? Yes, they are. In the land of YouTube, the content creator is King. Nowadays, it’s much more common for Hollywood to reach out to new talent instead of them reaching out to Hollywood. But you need to do something worth reaching out for. And it has to be something that tells executives that not only do you have an original voice, but that you understand what can sell and what can connect with a broad group of people. So if 200 people have viewed your video, that’s not good enough - if 2 MILLION have, you’re getting warmer.

With the internet, many of the old rules have been modified, but that doesn’t mean the rules are non-existent.   So, with all due respect to Mr. Goldman - and he is due a great deal of it - I believe that his quotes should be amended to “nobody knows EVERYTHING” and “there are some rules.”

And understanding them could be your key to Hollywood.

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Playing Hollywood Nice

by Danny Manus

Whether we are meeting a new writer at a pitchfest or in a meeting or technologically like through VPF, the biggest fears that every development executive have are these: is this person going to play nice? Is this person speaking to me going to be someone that I am want to deal with for the next 1-5 years of my life? If I give this person my card, is he or she going to abuse it?

Now I have listened to thousands of pitches and met with hundreds of writers, and for the most part, they were all great. But I’d say that out of 2500 pitches, I’ve had about 25 writers that just didn’t know how to play nice. Yes, that’s only about 1%, which doesn’t sound like a lot. But I’d like to get that number down to zero. So I wanted to go through what it means to play nice:

1.      You’re going to respect the pass. If you have pitched me (whether in person, or over the net) and I politely pass and do not ask for the script, you need to take that as the answer. While I always admire persistence, there’s a thin line between it and being pushy or annoying. There’s probably a reason I passed – whether it’s the writing or it’s something we are developing already or it’s just not the genre we are looking for, etc. - you asking 3 more times or begging is not going to change my mind. It’s only going to reinforce the pass.
2.     If you have my card, you’re not going to call every day or every week or even every month to pitch a new idea or re-pitch an old one because you’ve made changes.  Do not pitch the same project to me more than once unless you have done a complete page one rewrite. And never pitch it more than twice.
3.      If you don’t like the response you get, you’re not going to send off an angry email telling me how development executives are evil and stupid. I’ve received hate mail from my blogs and my responses to a pitch, but does anyone think the best way to get a second chance is by insulting me? Come on. If you can’t play like adults, go back to sitting at the kids table.
4.     You’re not going to give out my information to your whole writing group or class or every writer you know. You worked to get that card - they didn’t.
5.     No MyStalking or FaceStalking. Just because we had a lovely 5 minute conversation and I asked to read your script, that doesn’t mean I want to be BFFs. It doesn’t mean I want to add you to my friends list on Facebook or Myspace or any other site. Yes, those sites are for networking. But, I don’t accept random writers I don’t know personally (or who aren’t professional famous writers of course) on my Facebook because I don’t want to be pitched through those sites. And neither does any other exec, and there have been a rash of Facebook queries in the last few months. This is not the right way.

So – why DON’T I just take 5 minutes and read the first 10 pages? It’s not that big a deal right? Well, it’s simple math actually. Let’s say I get pitched 100 scripts in any given day at a pitchfest. Maybe – MAYBE – I’ll ask for 10 scripts. That means I’m passing on 90. If for all those passes – scripts I wasn’t interested in – I had to read 10 page, that would take roughly 450 minutes. That’s almost 8 hours and that’s not including the time it would take to email all those writers back (another 2 hours). Why and how could I spend 10 hours reading 10 pages of scripts that didn’t interest me to begin with? 

Execs all realize how hard you’ve worked on your scripts. And every writer thinks that if they can just get someone to read 10 pages, they will love it. And while our opinions are completely subjective and occasionally wrong, they do come with at least a few years of experience and a different perspective from yours. And we can often tell within a 5 minute pitch – even without reading the script – how that script is going to read. Writers hate when I say that because they think it somehow devalues their talent or their hard work. Perhaps it does, even though it’s not meant to. But I am right 85% of the time and I like those odds.
You all remember the golden rule of the sandbox. Well - here’s the golden rule of screenwriters – pitch unto others as you’d like others to pitch unto you.

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


What Not To Say

by Danny Manus

It’s the end of the year, so in the spirit of giving, I wanted to present you with the 5 things I hear most often from writers…and why they’re not the things you should be saying.

1) “No, no, you don’t understand…Mine’s really good!”  I will never believe a writer who says this until the day that I hear a writer say, “No, no, you don’t understand…my script is horrible!” I would hope that you think your script is really good – if you don’t, then you’re wasting your time pitching it! Use descriptive and active words to describe your project, not general blanket amateurish statements. Be specific – what is it exactly that makes your project interesting and different.

2) “How do I get an agent?” No matter how many classes or seminars I teach or listen to, no matter how many articles I read or write, this is STILL the first question out of every writer’s mouth. Why are you wondering how to get an agent when you’ve only written one script or you’re still on your first draft? Cart…Horse. But right here, right now, I will answer this question so you never have to ask it again. There are 3 ways to find an agent.  One - be related to, or friends with, an agent. Or know someone who is friends with an agent. The best way to get an agent’s attention is by referral and knowing someone is key to making it in this business. This is a small world so chances are someone you know can connect you somehow.  Second, submit your script to a bunch of prestigious national contests – and win – or at least be a finalist. And keep winning, especially contests where the prize is a meeting with an agent or getting your script read by the town. If you’re a quarterfinalist, that’s not enough to get an agent’s attention. And third, go to pitchfests and meet with agents and hopefully get read or send queries through services like Virtual Pitch Fest and see what happens.  But no matter which way you choose, make sure you have at least 2 or 3 FINISHED scripts before looking for an agent because a good agent won’t look at you if you only have one script. A manager might, but an agent won’t because it will take too long for them to make money from you.

3) “How do I sell my script and how much can I get paid?” You can’t, and nothing. If you are a first time writer with no credits, no representation, no track record and no connections, you will not sell your first script. Probably not the second either. It takes A LONG time, on average, to sell your first script if you’re breaking in from the outside. More likely, you might option your script, but if it’s your first, chances are it will be a free option. If you got into screenwriting to make a quick buck, you are going to be sorely disappointed.

4) “How many drafts will I have to do until it’s done?” As many as it takes. You’re the writer…keep writing. It’s great experience! If a producer or studio has kept you on a project long enough to do ten drafts, you’re LUCKY. They could have replaced you after the first draft. Take it as a compliment. There is a limit though, depending on who is attached to the project. Somewhere around fifteen drafts, you should be asking your producer what the timeline he or she foresees for going out with the project.

5) “How do I know if my project is commercial or sellable?” Do your research. Read the trades. See what’s selling, who is looking for what, what pitches and genres are working and doing well at the box office, see what types of projects first time writers are finding success with, etc., etc. There are always exceptions to the rules, but doing your research will give you a good idea as to what can sell. Generally, comedies and thrillers are the biggest sellers, followed by horror and action. Drama and period pieces pull up the rear.

Now stop asking these questions and start asking the most important question there is – “How can I make my script better?” Good luck and keep writing! And Happy Holidays everyone!             

   

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Oh God!…Again?

by Danny Manus

As I travel the country speaking to new groups of writers and attending pitchfests and conferences outside of Los Angeles, a certain trend in the types of material I hear has become clear and it alludes to a huge cultural difference between those who live in L.A. and NY and those who live elsewhere.

At an L.A.-based pitching conference, perhaps 5 out of 100 pitches I receive revolve around spirituality, new age religion, or some faith-infused plotline. But at recent trips to Santa Fe, Portland, and Dallas, I would say at least 40% of the total projects I was pitched or consulted on were based on spirituality in some form, including some sort of Native American angle or practice. Since Native Americans currently only make up about 5% of the U.S. population, why do people think this would be a big commercial success?  And why is this observation of the connection between location and religion important? Because if no one in L.A. connects to this spiritual/new age/true believers movement, then why would we make a movie about it? Now, Angelinos are known for being progressive, spiritual and new age, but we’re more the organic, yoga, too lazy for real religion type of progressives. Screenwriters and producers in here worship a different deity…and it’s green and fits in your wallet. I am convinced that this difference in attitude towards religion is what’s keeping many writers from writing a commercial project – because they think religion IS commercial…and it’s not.

Writers often think that what affects their own personal life or beliefs will work for a broad audience and is therefore commercial, but that’s just not the case. You have always been told to avoid conversations about religion and politics at big dinner parties…well think of your marketplace as a big dinner party with lots of different types of people attending.  Religious types will often retort with how successful “Passion of the Christ” was – and it was – but that was an anomaly directed by Mel Gibson. Now, there is a huge book market for these types of projects and most of these pitches would make for great novels, just not movies. There is also a big and potentially profitable niche market for faith-based movies – “Fireproof” proved that. However, this is a mostly Christian market. There really is no market for new age spirituality or Native American tradition. I cannot think of one company that is actively looking for anything like this. If I’m wrong, please – companies – tell me, because I have about 100 pitches I’d like to send your way.

I respect how important spiritualism is to some people and if there is some sort of religious theme you would like to express through a completely unrelated story, that’s fine. Or maybe you read a passage in the Bible and it inspires an idea for a horror or action movie – that’s fine. Or maybe a character’s spiritual beliefs are a small part of his or her arc – that’s fine too. You just have to be aware of how much you are including the religious/spiritual aspects on the page.  I understand trying to bring one’s religious beliefs to a larger audience – but that’s what Republicans are for, not screenwriters. As a general rule, if you want to write a commercial and mainstream Hollywood movie, keep your religious beliefs in your heart and your head, not on the page.               

   

   

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Good Loglines

by Danny Manus

By now you know the importance of a good logline - but do you know how to write one?

Your logline is the first (and sometimes only) thing an executive is going to read of your work, so it needs to grab his or her attention, tell them something, make them curious to read more, and make it clear that there is a real story there.

Often, writers confuse the logline with a tagline. These are not the same thing! A tagline is what goes on the poster, is said in the commercial, etc. The logline is what’s going to get it read in the first place. A tagline is 6-7 words that are quick and clever and makes one curious about the story, but don’t really say much about it. It’s often related to the hook of your story or the marketing angle, but not the plot.

The logline, on the other hand, needs to be 25 words or less (preferably less) and contain no more than 2 commas. It doesn’t need to tell us your main character’s name, but it can. What it needs to do, is tell us the genre and the conflict, and sell us on what makes your script different without using any of those words. It needs to contain action words, not just passive, descriptive words. It should tell us a tiny bit of the set up or starting point and then what the main commercial story point is that happens. Not easy to do in 25 words is it?

For instance, which sounds better? “A newlywed couple thinks they have found the key to a happy marriage but their friends aren’t convinced.” Or: “When a newlywed couple thinks they find the key to a happy marriage, their friends attempt to prove them wrong by igniting an all out gender battle.” Which sounds sexier? Which tells you that there’s going to be some FUN and some CONFLICT in the script? You gotta jazz it up! Now in comparison, the tagline for this same movie might be something like, “Being happily married never hurt so much” or “With friends like these, who needs marriage?” See the difference?

There are other types of loglines that have been used to sell projects. One of the most famous was the one for “Alien,” which was – “It’s Jaws in Space.” In those 4 words, the writer has set up the project’s location, genre and tone, and you can feel the tension that’s going to be included. You know you’re going to have a hero who tries to defeat the creature. Now, unless you have something super-high-commercial like that, I wouldn’t suggest a first time writer try to sell their script in 4 words. Execs are going to need more from you, but if you can write something like that, chances are, you will get read.  However, those types of loglines usually only work with horror or action movies or if you are switching up the gender or race of another movie that was already made, like “Guess Who” which was just “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” but with the races reversed. And the logline is “A race reversal of Who’s Coming to Dinner.” Done. We get it.

Now, go take a look at your logline and make sure it POPS with fun, conflict, commerciality and charm. Make sure it’s the best it can be, because a good logline goes a long way!
 

 

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


I’ll Put a Spell On You

by Danny Manus

Quite a few writers lately have asked me if typos and grammatical mistakes are a big enough reason for me to pass on a project. My quick answer is YES. I then ask them: “Why do you ask? Do you intend on writing something with lots of typos?”  It almost seems like a silly question for a writer to ask. Are you worried that you can’t spell? Many of history’s greatest writers have stated publicly that they are horrible spellers or never passed a grammar class. Well, that’s okay because guess what – there’s a program that can help you with that.

One of my biggest personal pet peeves is spelling and grammar. Maybe part of that is because my mother is an English teacher and when I used bad grammar, she’d give me the eye. But the real reason is two-fold:

1. It distracts me. It takes me out of the story and the writing because now I’m counting and correcting spelling instead of connecting to your characters or trying to figure out the big picture of your script.

2. It tells me that you are a lazy and sloppy writer, and I don’t like to work with lazy writers. It takes so very little time to run a spell check or grammar check and you, the writer, should be going over every word of your script with a fine-toothed comb before you submit it anywhere – even to a script consultant.

However, never in the history of screenwriting has a script been passed on because it had one or two misspelled words. Okay, maybe Scott Rudin did it once, but it was a busy day. So when I say typos, I don’t mean a couple. I mean if there are one or two typos on EVERY page (or every 5 pages)…then yeah, I might pass because I don’t think you worked hard enough to make it look professional.

The bottom line is – with the myriad of reasons executives and analysts have to pass on your script, why would you want to give them one more? Especially something you have full control over. You can’t control what else they have in development or what genre they are looking for, but you can make sure that your script looks professional. If I find two scripts in the same genre that I love equally, which script do you think I’m going to want to read again and again – the one with typos and mis-wordings and grammatical mistakes on every page (which also tells me they will be there in all subsequent drafts), or the one that reads clean and easy and keeps my head in the story?

Do yourself a favor…never ask an exec the question about typos again and instead, ask the following question of yourself: “Is my script the best representation of my ability as a writer?” And then make sure you spelled the question right.

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Pitch and Protect

by Danny Manus

Writers always ask me how they can protect themselves from having their ideas stolen. I’ve even met a few at different events that refuse to pitch their project because they think it’s so brilliant, that we, the producers, will have no choice but to steal it. What I tell these writers is two-fold: first, chances are – your idea isn’t THAT great, and even if it is, it’s probably not COMPLETELY original; secondly – if you’re not willing to tell anyone else about your script or pitch it to companies – what the hell did you write it for?

You can’t sell a script without telling someone what your story is! So, forget about your fears and take that next step! But first – be smart and protect yourself. There are some obvious steps one can take, which I will cite in a moment, but the biggest issue in writers thinking their ideas have been stolen is the fact that there are very few original ideas out there. I can’t tell you how many writers at a pitchfest or conference are SHOCKED when I tell them that I had thee other writers pitch me the same concept or story that day.  So newsflash – we don’t need your idea! There are so many projects out there, and if your idea is good but your writing stinks, we can find another writer who already wrote the same script, but better. We don’t have to steal anything. Plus, that’s not the reason producers go to these events. We’re not there to be unethical and it would reflect badly upon us if we were, so don’t worry about that.

Now, here’s the quick and easy way to ensure your confidentiality and property. Before pitching, querying, sending or selling your script, make sure you register your material – even if it’s just a rough first draft or treatment – with the Writers Guild.  It’s pretty cheap to register your script and it will be well worth it to all parties. You can do so by going to the following websites: www.wga.org  OR www.wgaeast.org, for those on the East Coast. You can also copyright your script through the U.S. Copyright Office at http://www.copyright.gov.
Good luck and keep writing!

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


He’s Just Not That Into You…Or Your Writing

by Danny Manus

So for a writer, dealing with an executive is often a bit more like dating than business. And in a courtship, sometimes less is more. And much like in dating, making the wrong move at the wrong time, or sending the wrong message, can often end a relationship. One of the biggest concerns of writers – and understandably one of their biggest frustrations – is what to do after they’ve actually submitted their script. You’ve gotten the okay to send the script, you’ve made sure it’s professional and ready, and you’ve sent it with a lovely cover letter. And now…you wait. Sound familiar?

How long do you wait? Do you make contact first? Is there a three week rule the same way there’s a three day rule before calling a girl back? The honest answer is – in general, you wait until they get back to you. But this all depends on the situation. If you are represented, you should have your agent or manager get in touch with the exec in about 2-3 week’s time. If you are unrepresented but had an actual in-person meeting with the exec, during which they gave you his or her card, then you should follow up yourself in about three week’s time. Now, if the exec promised to get back to you in a couple of days, then maybe follow up in two weeks instead of three. If your submission resulted from a pitchfest or cold query, then I would probably wait about a month to contact the exec you sent the script to.

So, let’s say hypothetically, you met with an exec, but you’re not represented. It’s been three weeks and they have not gotten back to you (and by the way, holidays are not counted in that time so if you submitted your script the Monday of Thanksgiving week – don’t even bother counting it). What should you do? Write them a very short and sweet email with the subject line being your script’s title and maybe something quick like “Checking in.” And in the email, all you need is one succinct and respectful line that goes something like:

“Dear So and So,
Just wanted to drop you a line and see if you’ve had a chance to read ‘my script.’ I look forward to your thoughts.
Best regards,
Your Name.”

That’s it. Do NOT point out that you submitted it over a month ago. Do not point out that the exec had promised to get back to you in a week or two. Do NOT reiterate what your story was, how great it is, or how perfect it would be for their company. You already made your pitch – that’s why they’re reading the script. All you need to do is gently remind them that they haven’t responded yet, and that one line will do that.

Here’s what NOT to do:

“Dear So and So,
I submitted my script ‘Called This’ over a month ago and I haven’t heard back from you yet. You had given me your card and thought it was a great pitch. I really think that ‘Called This’ is the perfect script for you. It’s incredibly original with great characters and blah blah blah. I hope you get back to me soon.
Sincerely,
Your name”

Writing something like this shows a lack of professionalism and tact and your script will probably be tossed in the pass pile. And even more importantly than not writing something like this, is not writing more than ONE follow up email. So, keep it short, sweet and professional…and then wait. Patience is a virtue. Execs read anywhere from seven to 25 scripts a week so you just don’t know if you’ve caught them on a busy week or not. Don’t think that just because he hasn’t gotten back to you, that he’s not interested or didn’t like your writing. Now if it’s been over three months, then chances are your writing was so bad that the exec didn’t feel he needed to waste time responding, but don’t get paranoid if it’s only been a few weeks.

Getting a second “date” with an exec isn’t hard – you just have to make a good first impression.

And maybe wear something low cut. No not you, sir. Just kidding.

Best of luck and keep writing!

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


2008 Recap

by Danny Manus

The end of the year is always a strange time of reflection for me. I like to take stock of what the past year has been, what I’ve accomplished (or not accomplished, and what the next year will hopefully bring (or not bring).

This was an insanely hard year for the entertainment business, in both TV and Film. There was the writers’ strike and the threat of a SAG strike. Many specialty arms of studios and independent companies shut down, the economy caused hedge funds to run screaming from Hollywood, and frankly, there just wasn’t an abundance of great movies. If you disagree, let me remind you that for two whole weeks, “Beverly Hills Chihuahua” led the American box office.

Before the rash (and take that anyway you want to) of “awards” movies started being released in November, I can’t even think of ten movies I really enjoyed this year. “WALL-E,” “Iron Man,” “Dark Knight,” “Towelhead,” “Nick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist,” “Sex and the City,” and “Tropic Thunder.” That’s about it. And by the way, other than Heath Ledger’s nomination-worthy performance, I didn’t think “The Dark Knight” was that great.

So while I’ll get to my favorite picks of the year in a moment, let’s talk about the crap first.  This year, comedy took a nosedive. Even the biggest comedies of the year were far from good. “The Love Guru,” “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan,” “Hamlet 2,” and “Burn After Reading” (the most overrated movie this year), were all marginal at best. And “Guru” was almost unwatchable. My personal picks for favorite comedies of the year are “Towelhead” (one of the best movies I’ve seen this year), “Tropic Thunder,” “Nick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist,” “Vicky Christina Barcelona,” and “Role Models.” With “Zack and Miri Make a Porno,” “Bolt,” and “Mamma Mia!: as close runner-ups.

On the drama side, the biggest trend this year was the prevalence of disappointing movies by solid writers or directors. “Blindness”, “Body of Lies,” “W,” “Choke,” “Flash of Genius,” and “Miracle at St. Anna” were all not as good as they should have been.

Did I mention “Burn After Reading”?

But in the last few weeks, a number of solid movies have been released. And this is why no one cares about the Golden Globes and the Oscars anymore. No one outside of L.A. and NY gets to see these movies because they’re only released here for three weeks to qualify, and then only some get wider releases in January. So, unlike “Titanic,” which played in theaters for almost eight months, with everyone seeing it at least twice, none of the movies in contention this year have that kind of name value. Sorry nerds, “The Dark Knight” is NOT in contention. The closest film that might be is “WALL-E.”

Let me say that the Golden Globe nominations have proven once again that the Foreign Press is nothing more than a bunch of star-fuckers. What other reason could there be to leave performances like Melissa Leo’s in “Frozen River,” Peter MacDissi’s in “Towelhead,” or Rosemarie DeWitt’s in “Rachel Getting Married” off the list? Yet Tom Cruise, James Franco, Frances McDormand and Colin Farrell get noms? Really?

The only category I thought was right on was for Best male lead in a drama. Thank God Clint Eastwood wasn’t nominated. Sorry gramps but you’re no longer audible. “The Reader” over “Milk” or “The Wrestler” or “Defiance”? Really? “In Bruges” over “Tropic Thunder”? Really?

I’m not thrilled with the other nominations, but other than the few I mentioned above, I couldn’t think of many snubs or replacements that deserved the spots.

So, my picks for best dramatic feature of the year are “Milk,” “Slumdog Millionaire,” “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” and “Changeling.” However, let me say that, like many of you, I have not seen “Frost/Nixon,” “Revolutionary Road,” or “The Reader” yet. So, I’m leaving that final slot open for whichever one or two of those I feel deserving. And if none of them are , I’m filling the slot with “The Wrestler.”

And for all you fellow TV whores out there – I didn’t forget about you. I think the Globe nomiantions for TV this year are horrible. We get it – the Foreign Press only watches three stations and none of them are Networks. Now, I love “Dexter,” and “Mad Men” is a good show. But “True Blood” and “In Treatment” over the final and outrageously powerful last season of “The Shield”? Or what was arguably the best season of “Lost” since its first season? And no series noms for “The Closer” or “Saving Grace”? If I ran the world, my picks for drama would have been “House,” “Mad Men,” “Lost,” “The Closer,” and “The Shield.” And for the love of all that is holy, can’t “How I Met Your Mother” get a nomination please? I’m not saying the comedy shows recognized aren’t equally deserving, but “Weeds” and “Entourage” haven’t been on point in a while. Whew, now I feel better.

Once the Globes are over, I’m sure we’ll all make our Oscar picks. But as the year comes to an end, let’s all hope that 2009 brings us more luck, more joy, more riches, and more movies that make us happy and proud to work in this business. Hell, it’s gotta be better than this year right?

If you don’t believe me, I’ll leave you with these two words: “Meet Dave.” Happy Holidays everyone!

About the Author:
Danny Manus has been a Hollywood development executive for several years, as well as an independent producer. He's an in-demand script consultant, has written articles for publications such as "Script Magazine" and teaches seminars to writers all across the country.


Next Page »

Need a Script Consultant? Visit www.ScriptCoach.com

Comments or questions? Please contact info@virtualpitchfest.com

subscribe | members login | techsupport@virtualpitchfest.com
Copyright © 2005 www.VirtualPitchFest.com - All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use

site maintained by Jared Wilder